Public Benefit Corporation · Government-only Free 30‑day trial · No payment, no credit card · Start today →
Open Data · IN · Municipal

Town Of Cicero

ciceroin.org
Population5,630
TypeMunicipal
ClassGeneral Purpose
CountyHamilton
StateIN
Last scan
F
Overall posture
Critical — 2 of 16 controls passing
Generated from the latest scan of ciceroin.org. Detailed findings are listed below.
Web Security · F · 1 of 8 passing ciceroin.org
✓
SSL/TLS
Implemented and verified.
PASS
—
×
HTTPS
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
×
HSTS
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
×
Cert
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
×
CAA
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
×
X-Frame
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
×
X-Content
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
×
sec.txt
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
Email Security · F · 0 of 5 passing ciceroin.org
×
SPF
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
×
DKIM
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
×
DMARC
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
×
MTA-STS
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
×
TLS-RPT
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
DNS & Infrastructure · D+ · 1 of 3 passing ciceroin.org
×
DNSSEC
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
×
IPv6
Not implemented — review the linked guide for fix steps.
CHECK
How to fix →
✓
RPKI
Implemented and verified.
PASS
—

Share Town Of Cicero’s security grade

Town Of Cicero earned a F security grade. Significant gaps put residents’ data and the agency’s budget at risk.

Help this agency improve Why security grades matter